Technical SEO automation
SEOAVA separates what can be safely automated from what still needs review. Technical changes carry stronger evidence, approval and verification requirements than low-risk metadata edits.
Interactive workflow
Choose a step to see what SEOAVA is responsible for at that point in the workflow.
Evidence first
SEOAVA connects the issue to the real page and the evidence that supports changing it.
SEOAVA evaluates rendered HTML and relevant HTTP headers instead of trusting one source in isolation.
Meta robots and X-Robots-Tag are both considered
HTML and HTTP Link canonicals are combined
Conflicting or unsupported states are not silently overwritten
Automatic redirect preparation is intentionally narrow so network failures or ambiguous URLs do not become permanent routing changes.
Source must be a verified HTTP 404 or 410
Source and target must be clean URLs without query strings or fragments
Target must be a live, indexable, self-canonical 200 page
Rendered hreflang clusters are checked for reciprocal links, indexability and canonical consistency.
Invalid and duplicate language codes are identified
Missing return links are surfaced
Direct WordPress publication refuses one-sided clusters
PageSpeed and Lighthouse evidence becomes review work, not permission to rewrite a theme blindly.
LCP, INP and CLS thresholds are recorded
Actionable Lighthouse audits retain their observed evidence
Recurring issues can reappear only after fresh later measurements
See it on your site
No fabricated score and no automatic write. The first step is simply to see what SEOAVA can observe.
